Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Dark Blues Business Trust launches rival bid to take over at Dens

Former Dundee owner Peter Marr is a trustee of the DBBT.
Former Dundee owner Peter Marr is a trustee of the DBBT.

Dundee’s takeover saga took another twist on Tuesday as it emerged that the Dark Blues Business Trust (DBBT) have tabled a bid to rival that of the Texas consortium currently in talks with the club.

The DBBT, of which former Dundee owner Peter Marr is a trustee, say they will invest £250,000 into the Dens Park outfit but only if the £650,000 offer pledged by US-led Football Partners Scotland (FPS) is rejected.

The club last night stressed that it will refrain from giving the latest bid consideration until the Texas-based package is voted on by shareholders, meaning FPS are still front runners to plough their cash into the club and take their plans forward.

But news of the DBBT bid has certainly given fans some food for thought, particularly those sceptical of the US-led consortium’s motives.

Sources close to the DBBT have told Courier Sport they believe their offering is a “very viable alternative” to that proposed by Keyes Capital, and would secure a proxy shareholding of 20%.

They have also refused to rule out working with those behind the FPS offer, namely Tim Keyes, John Nelms and former directors Steve Martin and Bill Colvin, if the DBBT bid is successful, with sources last night suggesting DBBT would be willing to develop an “open and collaborative dialogue” with all stakeholders.

Despite the latest turn of events, a club statement suggested that the more substantial FPS offer remains the clear favourite.

“Club directors received an offer on July 7 of investment from the DBBT in the sum of £250,000,” it read. “At a meeting held yesterday to consider this offer, the directors felt that they could not give detailed consideration to it, until such time as the shareholders had the opportunity to vote on the £650,000 offer from FPS.

“The terms of the DBBT offer was such that it was only available if the FPS offer was not progressed.

“The directors would have been guilty of a breach of their fiduciary duty were they not to have taken this course of action as the financial difference between the two offers were so materially different.

“The directors are close to having all the necessary paperwork prepared to allow shareholders to vote on the FPS offer.”

It is understood the DBBT representatives plan to meet on July 18 to discuss the situation in greater detail and will invite all members of the newly-formed DFC development committee.